Open menu
Civic Worth is in beta. It’s assembled automatically from public records and can be wrong. Check the official source before you rely on it, and tell us what’s wrong, or see what we’ve corrected.
Submit a correction
Civic Worth synthesizes public records — county auditor data, zoning ordinances, 311 cases, elected officials. If something on a parcel page is wrong, submit it here. We review every submission within 48 hours; flagged parcels show a "disputed" badge during review so other readers know the page is being checked.
Want to see what we've already fixed? Jump to the corrections we've made.
Corrections we’ve made
What was wrong, and what we changed, newest first. We add an entry only after the fix is live.
· Found by us
Blog: “Why Your Columbus Neighborhood’s Code-Complaint Numbers Might Say More About Your Neighbors Than Your Street” (formerly “Why Your Columbus Block’s Code-Complaint Numbers Might Say More About Your Neighbors Than Your Block”)
What was wrong. The post said Columbus’s code-enforcement data speaks only to how often people report problems, described the map as showing numbers for your block, said Civic Worth never implies a high-complaint area is doing worse, and listed a ward among the districts that represent you.
What changed. The City also publishes its code enforcement cases with inspection results and status (City of Columbus, Code Enforcement Cases), the map reports neighborhoods, the City’s Columbus Communities planning areas, under the title "Code enforcement & blight," and Columbus City Council members are each elected from one of nine districts (Columbus City Charter, Sec. 4).
· Found by us
Blog: “How a COTA Route Change Happens, and How It Relates to Columbus Zoning” (formerly “How COTA Route Consolidations Quietly Redraw Which Columbus Blocks Look ’Investable’”)
What was wrong. The post said a COTA route consolidation happens without any public hearing, quietly shifts which Columbus parcels draw development, and that area commissions make zoning decisions.
What changed. COTA presents proposed changes at public meetings before each of its three yearly service changes, and area commissions make advisory recommendations while the Board of Zoning Adjustment or City Council decides (COTA, Service Changes; Columbus City Code 3109.14, 3109.15, 3307.04 and 3307.10). We took the article offline on October 3, 2026 and republished it the same day, rewritten from primary sources with a correction note at the top.
· Found by us
Blog: “How Columbus Plans Development Around Transit, and How to Check Your Address” (formerly “Does Bus Access Predict Which Columbus Neighborhoods Get Development? What the Parcel-Level Data Shows”)
What was wrong. The post said parcel-level data shows that bus access predicts which Columbus blocks get new development, repaved streets or sidewalk repairs, but Civic Worth had not measured that and we found no source that shows it.
What changed. What is documented is that the City and COTA plan development and transit together in public: the City’s Zone In zoning rewrite began on the city’s primary mixed-use corridors, and LinkUS, created by COTA, the City, Franklin County and the Mid-Ohio Regional Planning Commission, pairs new rapid-transit lines with plans for development around their stations (City of Columbus, August 20, 2026; COTA, LinkUS; LinkUS, Transit-Oriented Development). We took the article offline on October 3, 2026 and republished it the same day, rewritten from primary sources with a correction note at the top.
· Found by us
Blog: “Same Complaint, Different Waiting Room: What Columbus 311 Response Times Actually Measure”
What was wrong. The post said Civic Worth’s 311 response-time map normalizes requests per 1,000 parcels and that the City’s 311 data does not show the mix of requests.
What changed. The map uses shares and medians (share resolved within 7 days, median days to close, median age of open requests), and the City’s 311 data records each request’s type and the department it was assigned to (City of Columbus, 311 Service Requests Last 30 Days; Civic Worth methodology).
· Found by us
Blog: “How to Check 311 Requests for Your Columbus Address”
What was wrong. The post said each 311 request is tied to a specific parcel, that a Civic Worth lookup shows the 311 history of that exact parcel, and that a request left open for months reflects City capacity rather than the property.
What changed. The City’s 311 data records a street address or intersection and map coordinates, not a parcel; Civic Worth’s free lookup shows recent 311 requests within 200 meters of a parcel; and a code-enforcement case can stay open at a status such as "Written Orders Issued" (City of Columbus, 311 Service Requests Last 30 Days).
· Found by us
Blog: “Why Is My Columbus 311 Request Taking So Long? How to Check Where It Stands” (formerly “Why Does My 311 Request Take So Long? What Columbus’s Backlog Really Tracks”)
What was wrong. The post said how fast a 311 request closes depends mainly on your council district and area commission, which it described as separate jurisdictions.
What changed. Columbus has one City Council whose members are each elected from one of nine districts (City Charter Sec. 4), area commissions are advisory bodies (C.C. 3109.14), and in the City’s own 311 data closure speed differs far more by type of request than by council district (City of Columbus, 311 Service Requests Last 30 Days, as of October 3, 2026). We took the article offline on October 3, 2026 and republished it the same day, rewritten from primary sources with a correction note at the top.
· Found by us
Blog: “What Your Block’s 311 Record Can and Can’t Tell You” (formerly “What Your Block’s 311 Backlog Actually Tells You About Your Neighborhood’s Future”)
What was wrong. The post said a block’s open 311 requests show where the City is paying attention and deploying resources.
What changed. The City’s 311 data records each request’s location, type, assigned department and status, not where resources go, and in that data how quickly requests close differs far more by type of request than by council district (City of Columbus, 311 Service Requests Last 30 Days, as of October 3, 2026). We took the article offline on October 3, 2026 and republished it the same day, rewritten from primary sources with a correction note at the top.
· Found by us
Blog: “What a 14-Digit PIN Knows About Your Property”
What was wrong. The post said a separate Recorder’s office keeps property documents, that a PIN’s last digits mark divided parcels, and that owners must check four separate county websites.
What changed. Recorded documents are kept by the Cook County Clerk’s Recordings Division, the last four digits identify condominium units and leaseholds (a divided parcel gets a new PIN), and the Treasurer’s Cook County Property Tax Portal already gathers tax and appeal information by PIN (Cook County Clerk; Cook County Treasurer).
· Found by us
Blog: “The Chicago Flag’s Four Stars, and Why Civic Data Is the Fifth”
What was wrong. The post said a ward decides what happens on a street.
What changed. A ward elects an alderperson, and zoning map amendments are decided by the full City Council (City of Chicago, Department of Planning and Development).
· Found by us
Blog: “Is Your Chicago Lot ADU-Eligible? The Ordinance, as Data”
What was wrong. The post said non-residential parcels are excluded from Chicago’s ADU ordinance, that the single-family expansion areas were still being finalized, and that the City had no tool for checking a lot’s eligibility.
What changed. ADUs are allowed by right in certain business and commercial districts as well as multi-unit residential ones, the single-family areas are set by City Council ordinance, and the City’s Department of Housing publishes an interactive eligibility map at chicago.gov/adu (City of Chicago).
· Found by us
Blog: “Community Areas vs. Wards — Which Chicago Geography Matters for What”
What was wrong. The post said your ward tells you who decides zoning matters.
What changed. Zoning map amendments are decided by the full City Council, and variations and special uses go to the Zoning Board of Appeals (City of Chicago, Department of Planning and Development).
· Found by us
Blog: “What the 2027 Chicago Reassessment Actually Does to Your Assessment”
What was wrong. The post said the Assessor’s reassessment notice shows an assessed value rather than a market estimate, and that any later drop below the mailed value means an appeal reduced it.
What changed. The notice carries the Assessor’s estimated fair market value, the assessed value for residential property is usually 10% of that estimate, and the Board of Review can also lower an assessment on its own motion (Cook County Assessor; 35 ILCS 200/16-95).
· Found by us
Blog: “How to Read Your Block’s Appeal Pipeline — Mailed vs. Certified vs. Board”
What was wrong. The post said the Assessor’s certified value includes Certificates of Error and that any drop below the mailed value means an appeal reduced the assessment.
What changed. A Certificate of Error corrects a value after the Assessor has certified it, and the Board of Review can also change an assessment on its own motion, whether or not the owner filed a complaint (Cook County Assessor; 35 ILCS 200/16-95).
· Found by us
Blog: “How to Find What’s Happening at Your Columbus Address Without a Records Request” (formerly “Why Can’t I Find Out What’s Happening With My Columbus Address Without Filing a Records Request?”)
What was wrong. The post said Columbus zoning, variance, district and 311 data sits in staff-facing systems, and that getting it generally takes a formal records request and a multi-week wait.
What changed. The City publishes zoning, variance, council-district, area-commission and recent 311 data online. Ohio’s Public Records Act requires records to be “promptly prepared” and copies made available “within a reasonable period of time.” We took the article offline on October 3, 2026 and republished it the same day, rewritten from primary sources with a correction note at the top.
· Found by us
Blog: “How to Look Up a Property’s Zoning History Before a Columbus Variance Hearing”
What was wrong. The post said Civic Worth’s Zone In Decoder shows a parcel’s past zoning, prior variances and pending requests, and described the Board of Zoning Adjustment as deciding after City Council.
What changed. The Decoder compares a parcel’s current district with its proposed Zone In district. A parcel’s rezoning and variance cases are in the City’s own zoning map layers, which the post now explains. We took the article offline on October 3, 2026 and republished it the same day, rewritten from primary sources with a correction note at the top.
· Found by us
Blog: “What a Columbus Variance Application Shows, and What Happens Before the Hearing” (formerly “Why a Zoning Variance Is the Last Thing You See, Not the First”)
What was wrong. The post said a zoning variance is the last visible step of decisions already made through tax increment financing districts and capital infrastructure plans.
What changed. A variance is decided at a public hearing by the Board of Zoning Adjustment, or by City Council for a use variance, after staff review and the neighborhood group’s recommendation are complete. We took the article offline on October 3, 2026 and republished it the same day, rewritten from primary sources with a correction note at the top.
· Found by us
Blog: “How to Compare Zoning Variances Across Columbus Neighborhoods” (formerly “Why You Can’t Compare Zoning Variances Across Columbus Neighborhoods (And How to Check the Pattern Yourself)”)
What was wrong. The post said variances can’t be compared across neighborhoods because they sit in separate records, and that area commission decisions are later ratified or overturned by the Board of Zoning Adjustment.
What changed. The City maps approved Board of Zoning Adjustment and City Council variances citywide, from about 2005 on. Area commissions make advisory recommendations, and the board or City Council decides. We took the article offline on October 3, 2026 and republished it the same day, rewritten from primary sources with a correction note at the top.
· Found by us
Blog: “Who Decides a Columbus Zoning Variance, and What Recommendations Come First” (formerly “Who Really Decides a Columbus Zoning Variance: The Staff Recommendation vs. the Council Vote”)
What was wrong. The post said a City planner’s staff recommendation is the real decision on a zoning variance, and that City Council’s vote mostly ratifies it.
What changed. The Board of Zoning Adjustment decides most variances, and its vote is final. City Council decides use variances, and City staff and the neighborhood group make recommendations to them. We took the article offline on October 3, 2026 and republished it the same day, rewritten from primary sources with a correction note at the top.
· Found by us
Blog: “What Happens at a Columbus Area Commission Meeting, and What Its Vote Does” (formerly “What Area Commission Meetings Are Actually For (And Why the Vote Isn’t the Real Story)”)
What was wrong. The post said most of a zoning case is decided before the area commission meets, and that the Development Commission holds approval authority.
What changed. The City’s Board of Zoning Adjustment application requires the applicant to get the neighborhood group’s written recommendation before the hearing, and the board won’t consider the application until it’s complete. The Development Commission only recommends on rezonings. We took the article offline on October 3, 2026 and republished it the same day, rewritten from primary sources with a correction note at the top.
· Found by us
Blog: “What Is My Area Commission? How to Find Yours in Columbus” (formerly “What Is My Area Commission and Why Doesn’t Anyone Cover Its Meetings?”)
What was wrong. The post said Columbus has roughly two dozen area commissions of elected or appointed residents who review liquor permits, and that most of them meet at the same time.
What changed. The City lists 21 area commissions, which don’t cover the whole city. Their members are appointed by the mayor with City Council’s concurrence, and they meet in eight different weeknight slots. The post now lists every commission’s meeting time from the City’s records. We took the article offline on October 3, 2026 and republished it the same day, rewritten from primary sources with a correction note at the top.
· Found by us
Blog: “How to Hold Columbus City Government Accountable, One Address at a Time”
What was wrong. The post said Columbus covers 27,000 acres, that a lookup shows your ward and each parcel’s 311 history, and that a paid “Context Report” explains a specific variance.
What changed. Columbus covers about 222 square miles of land. The free lookup shows your council district, area commission, voting precinct, zoning and recent 311 requests nearby, and the paid reports are the Lite, Standard and Investor reports.
· Found by us
Blog: “What ‘Parcel-Resolved’ Civic Data Actually Means”
What was wrong. The post said Civic Worth had expanded across all 88 Ohio counties and showed each address’s assigned school and its flood and special-assessment layers.
What changed. Civic Worth covers Columbus (Franklin County) and Chicago, and shows the school district, not the assigned school. Flood-zone data is in paid reports, not the free lookup, and there is no special-assessment layer.
· Found by us
Blog: “What a Demolition Permit on Your Block Actually Tells You, and What to Do About It”
What was wrong. The post said a demolition permit doesn’t tell you why a building is coming down, that a parcel with no variance applications means no one is trying to build, and that addresses sit in wards.
What changed. A City-ordered demolition carries a Code Enforcement order number on the application. Construction that meets the existing zoning needs no variance, and the post now refers to council districts. It also explains the area commission’s 60-day review of demolition permits.
· Found by us
Blog: “What It Takes to Research a Columbus Variance, and Where the Records Are” (formerly “Why Your Neighborhood Group Pays a Paralegal to Read Public Records the City Already Has”)
What was wrong. The post said Civic Worth’s address lookup pulls a parcel’s 311 history and replaces the records research a variance hearing needs, and it gave cost and time figures we had no source for.
What changed. The free lookup shows a parcel’s representatives, zoning, nearest transit and recent 311 requests nearby, not its variance history. The post now points to the City’s published variance records and the factors the Board of Zoning Adjustment must weigh.
· Found by us
Blog: “Your Area Commission Votes on a Recommendation. Here’s Who Decides.” (formerly “Your Area Commission Doesn’t Vote on Zoning. Here’s Who Actually Does.”)
What was wrong. The post said area commissions don’t vote on zoning, that City Council makes the final decision on every zoning and variance case, and that Columbus has “dozens” of area commissions.
What changed. Area commissions vote on an advisory recommendation that is a required step. The Board of Zoning Adjustment decides most variances and special permits, and City Council decides rezonings and Council variances. The City has 21 area commissions. The post was retitled and rewritten with its sources.
· Found by us
Blog: “Columbus Zone In Phase 2 — How to Comment Before October 24”
What was wrong. The post said the draft proposes a zoning district for every Columbus address, and that the rezoning resolution was still on City Council’s agenda.
What changed. The draft covers about 70,654 parcels, roughly 41 percent of the city, and Council adopted Resolution 0183X-2026, its statement of intent to rezone, on August 24, 2026. The post lists the City’s three comment channels and its sources.
· Found by us
Blog: “Columbus Zone In Phase 2 — What Would Change for Your Address”
What was wrong. The post said the Zone In Decoder gives a side-by-side of current and proposed code text with a printable sheet for the City’s gallery, and that a use that’s legal today would continue as a “nonconformity.”
What changed. The post now describes what the Decoder shows: the draft Title 34 rules for a parcel’s proposed district, quoted section by section, with a dash for values we don’t have yet. It also explains the draft’s “pre-existing use” rule (Title 34 Public Review Draft, Section E.10.040) and how much of the city the draft covers.
· Found by us
Blog: “The Date on a Columbus Zoning or District Record Isn’t a Footnote, It’s the Whole Argument”
What was wrong. The post said the Development Commission rules on zoning variances, and that council district and ward lines were being redrawn now.
What changed. Variances are decided by the Board of Zoning Adjustment or City Council. The current district map stays in effect until a new districting plan is adopted, and what the November 3, 2026 ballot asks is how council members are elected.
· Found by us
Blog: “Columbus Council Districts — What Changes for Your Parcel”
What was wrong. The post said the council districts were last redrawn in 2023, that a district is only a residency line for candidates, and that your parcel’s district stays the same whatever the November ballot decides.
What changed. Council adopted the current districts in 2021 for the 2023 election. Each member is elected from one district by the voters of the whole city and must live in it. The post now names Issues 8 and 9, including Issue 9’s at-large seats and its call to redraw the district map in 2027.
· Found by us
Blog: “Council District vs. Area Commission: What Each One Does for Your Columbus Address” (formerly “Council District vs. Area Commission: Why Your Zoning Fight and Your Pothole Complaint Run Through Different Systems”)
What was wrong. The post said Columbus City Council members have districts only “for organizing purposes,” that every address is in an area commission and a “311 service district,” and that an area commission hears a zoning case before the City does.
What changed. Each council member is elected from one of nine districts by the voters of the whole city and must live in it (City Charter Secs. 4 and 6). The City’s 21 area commissions don’t cover the whole city, there is no City “311 service district,” and zoning applications are filed with the City, which sends a copy to the area commission. The post now also covers Issues 8 and 9 on the November 3, 2026 ballot and lists its sources.
· Reported by a reader
Blog: “Why the City Hears About a Variance Before Your Area Commission Does” (formerly “Why Does the City Already Know About a Zoning Variance Before Your Commission Does?”)
What was wrong. The post said a variance can seem decided before the hearing because of the City’s capital improvement budget, and built its advice around checking scheduled capital work. We had no source for that. It also said Columbus has “dozens” of area commissions; the City lists 21.
What changed. We rewrote the post around the real reason, sourced to Columbus City Code and the City’s 2026 Board of Zoning Adjustment application. A variance application is filed with the Department of Building and Zoning Services, and a copy goes to the area commission where there is one. The board won’t consider the case until staff issues are resolved and the neighborhood group’s recommendation is complete. A correction note at the top says what changed, and the post now lists its sources.
· Reported by a reader
Blog: “What a Columbus Area Commission Does in a Zoning Case” (formerly “What Area Commissions Are Actually For (It’s Not Stopping Development)”)
What was wrong. The post said an area commission’s review comes after most of a project’s decisions are made, and that its only power is to put a developer’s plans in public view. It also treated whether a commission’s recommendation is binding as an open question that depends on the case.
What changed. We rewrote the post from Columbus City Code Chapter 3109 and the City’s 2026 applications. A commission’s recommendation is advisory, but the applicant must meet the neighborhood group and get a written recommendation before the hearing. The Board of Zoning Adjustment won’t consider the case until that recommendation is complete. The post now says which body decides each kind of case, notes that not every address has an area commission, and lists its sources. A correction note at the top says what changed.
· Reported by a reader
Columbus civic maps: neighborhood boundaries
What was wrong. The Columbus maps drew each neighborhood as one of the City’s area commissions, stretched over nearby voting precincts until the shapes covered the whole city, and labeled each stretched shape with the commission’s name. That misdrew real commissions: the “Clintonville” shape covered about 15.9 square miles and crossed the Olentangy River and the rail line, while the Clintonville Area Commission’s own boundary is about 6.1 square miles. The maps also treated “area commission” and “neighborhood” as the same thing, though not every part of Columbus has an area commission.
What changed. The maps now use the City of Columbus’s 41 Columbus Communities planning areas as the City publishes them. Area commissions appear only as themselves: a “Show area commissions” layer draws the City’s 21 commission boundaries, and pointing at a spot says which commission it’s in, or “No area commission.” We removed the notice we had placed on these maps.
· Found by us
Columbus neighborhood pages and the Columbus hub
What was wrong. We described our 19 Columbus neighborhood pages as “19 area commissions.” Six of them have no area commission: German Village, Italian Village and the Brewery District have historic review commissions, Downtown has the Downtown Commission, and Northland and Far Northwest have community groups. The Brewery District page also named a “Brewery District Commission,” which no longer exists: the City’s Historic Resources Commission took over review there on February 1, 2024. The Downtown Commission was labeled a “City development commission,” easy to confuse with the City’s separate Development Commission.
What changed. The pages are now described as 19 neighborhood pages, 13 of which have one of the City’s 21 area commissions. The Brewery District page names the Historic Resources Commission, the Downtown Commission is labeled a design review commission, and each page’s rankings are across the City’s Columbus Communities.
· Found by us
Civic map detail panels, Columbus and Chicago
What was wrong. The panel that opens when you select an area said its boundary had been “grown to include adjacent areas” for every official boundary. That was false for Chicago’s community areas, which are the City of Chicago’s own boundaries, used unchanged.
What changed. Each panel now says what the boundary is: for Chicago, one of the City’s 77 community areas; for Columbus, one of the City’s Columbus Communities planning areas.
· Found by us
Downtown Columbus parcel pages (for example 188 E State St)
What was wrong. Pages for 62 downtown parcels listed a “Phase 2 Fixture Area Commission” and a “Phase 2 Fixture Neighborhood” as the parcel’s area commission and neighborhood. Those were test rows left in our production database. They aren’t real places.
What changed. We removed the test rows (five boundaries and ten test parcels). Those parcels now show no area commission and no neighborhood, which is accurate for downtown: it has no area commission. A check now fails if test rows reappear.
· Found by us
Storefront Scout corridor pages
What was wrong. Each corridor page named an “area commission” and a list of “Title 33 districts” taken from hand-entered data. Short North, Downtown High Street and Linden named commissions that don’t exist under those names, and some district codes (UCR-1, UCM-2, D-DTD) aren’t in the City’s zoning data.
What changed. A corridor now names an area commission only where one real commission covers at least half of the corridor’s outline (Parsons Avenue now reads “Columbus South Side”); otherwise none is named. The district list comes from the City’s zoning layer. Corridor outlines are still rough rectangles, so those lists describe the rectangle, not the whole neighborhood.
· Found by us
Press page, Short North corridor
What was wrong. The page said the corridor “sits inside the Title 33 UCR / UCR-1 / UCM-2 districts and is bounded by the Short North Area Commission.” The City’s list of 21 area commissions has none named Short North, and UCR-1 and UCM-2 don’t appear in the City’s zoning data.
What changed. We removed the commission claim. The page now says parcels along the corridor are zoned under a mix of Title 33 and Title 34 districts, including the Title 34 UCR and UCT districts that Zone In Phase 1 adopted.
· Found by us
Zone In Decoder: product description, /zone-in and /unlock
What was wrong. The Decoder’s description promised density, overlay and variance or appeal-path details that the report doesn’t provide, and the /zone-in page listed an accessory-dwelling-unit size cap we hadn’t sourced.
What changed. We rewrote the descriptions to match what the report contains and removed the unsourced cap. Buying the Zone In Decoder was paused for every parcel until the draft Title 34 text was loaded. It is back on sale for parcels whose proposed district’s draft standards for height, parking, uses and ADUs we have loaded and reviewed; for other parcels the server still refuses the purchase.
· Found by us
Zone In Decoder PDF
What was wrong. The PDF’s last page was a “Board of Zoning Adjustment variance-review prep sheet,” and the report was described as including one. Zone In is a zoning-code update that goes to City Council, not a variance request. The sheet’s process claims (code sections, deadlines, notice distances) had not been checked against the City’s own application. Nobody had bought the Decoder, so no delivered PDF carried it.
What changed. We removed the sheet. The last page is now “How to comment on the Zone In draft”: the City’s comment surveys, email and phone, the Gallery, and the comment-window close date.
· Reported by a reader
Zone In Decoder: missing values shown as “No change”
What was wrong. When the Decoder had no value for a rule on one side of a comparison (for example height, parking or allowed uses), it displayed “No change.” For 703 Weber Rd (C-4 to UGN-1) that made building height look unchanged when we simply didn’t have the draft’s height.
What changed. Missing values now show “—” and “Not in our data yet,” linked to the source that would hold the answer. For Phase 2 parcels the page shows the draft’s height in stories, labeled “Draft intent (Zone In map layer),” and says feet aren’t loaded yet.
· Reported by a reader
Zone In Decoder: Title 33 and Title 34 labels
What was wrong. The Decoder labeled every Zone In district “Title 33” and said its values were quoted from Title 33. Zone In districts belong to the new Title 34 zoning code, which is a different code with its own definitions, use tables and procedures. For 703 Weber Rd the proposed district appeared as “Title 33, Ch. E.20.”
What changed. Each district now shows the code it belongs to, and the first row of a comparison shows the move from Title 33 to Title 34 where that applies. Citations, the plain-text export and the paid-report text follow the same rule. Some Title 34 values are still missing, and the page says so.
· Reported by a reader
Zone In Decoder: “Draft a comment to your area commission”
What was wrong. The comment-drafting tool cited the proposed district under Title 33 and addressed drafts to the area commission or the Board of Zoning Adjustment. Zone In comments go to the City’s Zone In team. For Phase 2 drafts the tool also had only summary fields from the City’s map layer, not the draft code text.
What changed. We turned the tool off and made its server endpoint refuse requests. The page now points to the City’s own comment channels. It stayed off until we rebuilt it on the draft Title 34 text. On October 1, 2026 we turned it back on: each draft is addressed to the City’s Zone In team, states only what the draft Title 34 text sets for the property, each value cited to its section, and names the current Title 33 district without comparing it. Where we don’t have the verified text for a district, it says so and drafts nothing.